We'll approach continued fractions from a completely different viewpoint.
Let be a sequence of matrices.
Let
If and tend to the same limit
as then is the limit of the infinite
product of matrices, and we write
Example:
Let be a sequence of positive integers, except
we allow . Let
Then . The convergents are ,
and we have . Since , we see
the difference between successive convergents can be determined by studying
Example:
Suppose .
Let be nonzero numbers. Then .
Let
.
Then
provided . For some proofs, we exploit this and ignore
a finite number of matrices.
Example:
Given that
converges, find its limit.
Let
Then
Hence , and therefore .
Theorem: Consider a sequence of matrices of the form
.
where are positive integers satisfying
for some fixed . Then for
some irrational .
Proof: Let
.
We have ,
as and .
The last fact implies .
Also,
so lies strictly between and
.
Then:
since
Now for some
because
and if we asssume inductively that
it follows that
So as
and
where is defined by .
Hence is irrational, because if then:
as , a contradiction because
is always a nonzero integer (since
lies strictly between the previous two convergents).
Corollary: Let be positive integers. Then converges
to an irrational .
Proof: Apply theorem to continued fraction matrices.
Example: converges to an irrational number because apart from the first two matrices, we have
We can develop this theory further to derive continued fraction
expansions of hyperbolic trignometric functions.