]> Group Theory - Sylow Groups

Group Theory

Lemma: Let A be an abelian group. If p is a prime factor of A then A contains at least one element of order p

Proof: The lemma is trivial when A=p, which we shall use to start an induction. Assume A is composite. Then A contains a proper subgroup. Choose a proper subgroup H of maximum order. If pH then by induction H contains an element of order p, so assume (H,p)=1 . Then take some element gAH. Let t be the order of g. Consider the group A=Hg. Since A is abelian, we have Hg=gH thus A is a group. But since it strictly contains H, we have A=A by maximality of H.

Now Hg contains Ht/d elements where d=Hg. Thus Ad=Ht. Since the p divides the left-hand side, and (H,p)=1 , we must have pt, and g t/p is an element of order p.

If the order of a group G is divisible by p m but by no higher power of p for some prime p then any subgroup of G of order p m is called a Sylow group corresponding to p.

Theorem: Every group G possesses at least one Sylow group corresponding to each prime factor of G.

Proof: The theorem is immediate when G=2 , which we shall use to start an induction. Write G=p mr where (r,p)=1 . Decompose G into classes of conjugate elements, and pick elements a 1 ,...,a k from each class. Recall if h i denotes the size of the class containing a i we have G=h 1 +...+h k. Also recall the normalizer N i of a i satisfies N i=G/h i. We have two cases:

Case 1: Suppose there exists h i with h i>1 and (h i,p)=1 . Then N i is less than G and divisible by p m. By inductive hypthoesis, N i possesses a subgroup of order p m which is the Sylow group corresponding to p.

Case 2: For all i, we have h i=1 or ph i. We have h i=1 for self-conjugate elements, and we must have at least one of these since 1 is self-conjugate. Let z be the number of self-conjugate elements. Then p mr=z+xp for some integer x, hence pz. Thus the order of the center is divisible by p. Since it is abelian, by the lemma it contains at least one element g that commutes with all elements and has order p. Then P=g is a normal subgroup of G and G/P has order p m1 r. By the inductive hypothesis G/P contains a Sylow group of order p m1 , which we write H/P where H is a subgroup of G. Then p m1 =H/p, thus H=p m and H is a Sylow group of G corresponding to p.

Theorem: [Cauchy] Let G be a group. If p is a prime factor of G then G contains at least one element of order p

Proof: Let H be a Sylow group of G of order p m. If 1 hH then the order of h is p μ for some μ>0 . Then h p μ1 has order p.

All subgroups conjugate to a Sylow group are themselves Sylow groups. It turns out the converse is true.

Theorem: All Sylow groups belonging to the same prime are conjugates.

Proof: Let A,B be subgroups of G of order p m. Recall we can decompose G relative to A and B: G=Ag 1 B...Ag rB and G=AB/d 1 +...+AB/d r where d i is the size of D i=g i 1 Ag iB. We have A=B=p m and G=p mr where (r,p)=1 . Thus dividing by p m gives r=p md 1 +...p md r Now D i is a subgroup of B, hence d i is some nonnegative power of p and is at most p m. Since (r,p)=1 , we must have p m/d l=1 for some l, in other words d l=p m. Then D l has the same order as B and is contained in B, thus D l=B and similarly D l=g l 1 Ag l. Hence B=g l 1 Ag l implying that A,B are conjugate.

Corollary: A Sylow group is unique if and only if it is a normal subgroup.

Theorem: If there are exactly k Sylow groups of a group G corresponding to a prime p then k=1 modp and k divides G.

Proof: We know that the number of distinct Sylow groups is equal to the number k of distinct conjugates. Let A be some Sylow group corresponding to p and let N be the normalizer of A. Recall G=Nk thus k divides G.

Every aA satisfies a 1 Aa=A thus aN, Hence AN. Thus N=p mn where (n,p)=1 .

Decompose G as the disjoint sets G=Ag 1 N...Ag rN Then G=Np md 1 +...+Np md r where d i is the order of the group D i=g i 1 Ag iN. Without loss of generality assume g 1 =1 , hence Ag 1 N=AN=N. Now dividing by n gives k=1 +p md 2 +...+p md r Now suppose d i=p m for some i. Then D i=g i 1 Ag i, implying g i 1 Ag iN. Now N possesses a Sylow group of order p m, and we have already found two: A,g i 1 Ag i. But A is normal in N thus must be the unique Sylow group, hence A=g i 1 Ag i. Since N is the normalizer of A we must have g iN and hence Ag iN=AN=N, which is impossible unless i=1 .

Thus all terms in the above summation are divisble by p except for the first term which is equal to one.

Theorem: Any group G of order pq for primes p,q satisfying p1 (modq) and q1 (modp) is abelian.

Proof: We have already shown this for p=q so assume (p,q)=1 . Let P=a be a Sylow group of G corresponding to p. The number of such subgroups is a divisor of pq and also equal to 1 modulo p. Also q1 modp. Then since the number of such subgroups cannot be equal to p,q,pq, it must be equal to one. By the above corollary we have that P is normal in G of order p. Similarly we can find a group Q=b normal in G of order q.

Then PQ=QP, which by the product theorem is a subgroup order pq/PQ. But since (p,q)=1 they only have the identity element in common thus G=PQ. Also, recall these conditions also imply every element of P commutes with every element of Q. Then every element of G has the form a αb β=b βa α and is clearly abelian

A prime power group is a group whose order is a power of a prime. [It seems that nowadays they are referred to as p-groups.] All Sylow groups are prime power groups. Recall that a group G of order p m for a prime p has at least one nontrivial self-conjugate element, thus we can find a self-conjugate element of order p. Let a be such an element. Then x 1 ax for any xG, and a is a normal subgroup of order p. In general:

Theorem: A group of order p m for a prime p contains at least one normal subgroup of order p μ for any 0 <μ<m.

Proof: The theorem is true for m=2 because in this case the group is abelian. We shall use this case to base an induction.

Suppose G is a group of order p m for m>2 . Then let P be a normal subgroup of G of order p. Then G/P has order p m1 which by inductive assumption has an invariant subgroup of order p μ1 which has the form A/P for some normal subgroup A in G with order p μ.

Corollary: All prime power groups are soluble.

Proof: A group G of order p m has a normal subgroup A 1 of order p m1 which in turn contains a normal subgroup of order p m2 , and so on. Thus we can construct the composition series GA 1 A 2 ...A m1 {1 }

Example: There is no simple group of order 200. For let G be a group with order 200. Then since 200 =5 2 ×8 , G contains k Sylow groups of order 25 where k=1 mod5 and k200 . Thus k8 which is impossible unless k=1 . Thus there exists a unique normal Sylow group of order 25, and hence the group is not stimple.

Example: There is no simple group of order 30. Suppose there is such a group. Then none of its Sylow groups are unique, implying it has 1 +5 =6 Sylow groups of order 5, hence there are 6 ×4 =24 elements of order 5 , and similarly we must have 1 +3 ×3 =10 Sylow groups of order 3, thus the total number of elements is greater than 30, a contradiction.

We can now supply an alternative proof that A n is simple for n5 :

Proposition: If G=60 and G has more than one Sylow 5-subgroup then G is simple.

Proof: Suppose G=60 and contains more than one Sylow 5-subgroup, but there exists a proper normal subgroup. Then note we must have exactly 6 Sylow 5-subgroups. Let P be such a group. Then the normalizer of P has order 10 since its index is 6 .

If 5 H then H contains a Sylow 5 -subgroup of G and since H is normal it contains all 6 conjugates of this subgroup, hence H1 +6 4 =25 hence we must have H=30 . But by the previous example, G must have a unique Sylow 5-subgroup, a contradiction, thus 5 does not divide H.

If H is 6 or 12 then H has a normal Sylow subgroup of order 2,3, or 4, which is also normal in G, and we may replace H by this. Hence G/H=30 ,20 or 15 . Then by previous results, G/H has a normal subgroup of order 5 . Its preimage under the natural map is a normal subgroup whose order is a multiple of 5, which we have previously shown to be a contradiction.

Corollary: A 5 is simple.

Proof: The subgroups (1 2 3 4 5 ) and (1 3 2 4 5 ) are distinct Sylow 5-subgroups.

Theorem:A n is simple for all n5 .

TODO: proof