The Discriminant: Applications
We can identify integral bases using the discriminant. Let . Then they form an integral basis for if and only if .
We may also prove that is the number ring of for for any (previously it was only for prime powers).
Let be two number fields. Their composite field is the smallest subfield of containing both and . In fact, consists of elements of the form
for all .
Let be the number rings of . Clearly contains
However in general, equality does not hold, though under certain conditions it does. Let be the degrees of over . Let .
Theorem: Suppose that . Then .
Corollary: If and , then .
To prove the theorem, first we need the following lemma.
Lemma: Suppose . Let be an embedding of in and let be an embedding of in . Then there is an embedding of in that restricts to on and to on .
Proof: has extensions to embeddings of in and no two of them can agree on hence they have distinct restrictions to . One of these must be because has exactly embeddings in .
Proof of Theorem: Let be a basis for over and let be a basis for over . Then the products form a basis for over and for over . Any can be written in the form
where , and . We want to show that for all , . It suffices to show because then by symmetry, and then we are done.
By the lemma, every embedding of of in extends to an embedding of in that fixes . Thus
For set
Thus
for each . By Cramer's rule, where is the determinant formed by the coefficients , and is the same except that the th column has been replaced by . Now and the are algebraic integers, and . Setting gives , and thus
Since the form an integral basis for , must all be integers, thus . Since is coprime to we must have .
Corollary: Let . Then .
Proof: We know this is true if is a prime power. If is not a prime power, write for coprime . Suppose the result is true for . Then let
By inductive hypothesis . Since we have for some , and hence , and also . We also have since are coprime. Also, recall we have shown that divides a power of and a power of , thus their greatest common divisor is one. So we may apply the previous corollary to obtain