]> Number Fields - Fermat's Last Theorem

Fermat's Last Theorem

Next we attempt to show x n+y n=z n has no solutions over the integers for n>2 . There is a truly remarkable proof of this, but unfortunately this site is too small to contain it. We can make a start though.

Using the result on Pythagorean triples, it can be shown that the case n=4 has no solutions, so we need only consider when n is some odd prime p.

There are two cases. The first, case 1, is that p divides none of x,y,z. Case 2 is that p divides exactly one of x,y,z. We only consider the first case. The second is messier, but the results are similar.

For p=3 , considering the equation modulo 9 immediately shows there are no case 1 solutions.

For p>3 , we may attempt to mimic the process that used to find Pythagorean triples, as Kummer did. First we rewrite the equations as

(x+y)(x+yω)...(x+yω p1 )=z p

where ω=e 2 πi/p.

Then if [ω] is a UFD, one can show that x+yω=ua p for some unit u and a[ω]. This in turn implies x=y(modp). We also have x p+(z) p=(y) p, which by the same reasoning implies x=z(modp). Thus

2 x p=x p+y p=z p=x p(modp)

so p divides 3 x p, a contradiction since p>3 and p does not divide x because we are in case 1.

Unfortunately [ω] is not always a UFD. However, it turns out it is always a Dedekind domain, which means its ideals factor uniquely into prime ideals. Using this fact, one can show that the ideal x+yω=I p for some ideal I.

If p is regular, defined below, this implies that I is also a principal ideal thus x+yω=I p=a p=a p for some element a. In other words, x+yω=ua p for some unit u, and we can continue as before to prove case 1 of Fermat's Last Theorem for such primes.

Define a relation ~ on the set of ideals of [ω] as follows. For ideals A,B, say A~B if aA=bB for some a,b[ω]. It turns out this is an equivalence relation, and furthermore, there are finitely many equivalence classes. The number of classes is the class number, and denoted by h.

We call a prime p regular if p does not divide h.

The ideal classes form a group under multiplication. The identity element is the class of all principal ideals. This explains why regularity is important. If p is regular, then its ideal class group cannot contain an element of order p, and hence if I p is principal, then so is I.