Splitting of Primes in Extensions
Primes in are not necessarily irreducible in larger number rings. For example, in . Similarly, although remain irreducible in , the principal ideals do not. This phenomenon is known as splitting. We say splits into the product of two primes in . We shall study how a prime splits in a given number ring.
More generally, if is a prime ideal in some number ring for some number field , and if is a number field containing , we consider the prime decomposition of the ideal generated by in , i.e. .
For now we shall fix some notation. Let be number fields with and let , and "prime" means "nonzero prime ideal".
Theorem: Let be a prime of , and a prime of . The following are equivalent:
Proof: was proved earlier. since is an ideal in , trivially, since . We need only show . Now contains and is an ideal in . Since is maximal, we have or . If then which implies , a contradiction.
When the above conditions hold, we say that lies over , or that lies under .
Theorem: Every prime of lies over a unique prime of . Every prime of lies under at least one prime of .
Proof: For the first statement, we need to show that is a prime in . Observe . Also, we must have nonempty because in particular it contains for all , and norms of nonzero elements are nonzero in any integral domain. (Here means .) Lastly, if , then one of also lies in . If , then we have that one of lies in showing that it is indeed prime.
Now for the second statement. The primes lying over are the prime divisors of , so we need only show , that is, has at least one prime divisor. We shall show that by using lemma proved earlier: there exists a with . thus . Then if , we have . But this would mean is an algebraic integer, which is a contradiction.
The primes lying over are those that occur in the prime decomposition of . Their corresponding exponents are called the ramification indices. If is the exact power of dividing , then is the ramification index of over . We denote this by .
Example: Let . Then lies over (which we use as shorthand for ). It can be checked that is prime, and hence since . Also, we have for and any lying over .
More generally, if for where for some prime then the principal ideal is is a prime lying over , and (TODO: proof). Also whenever and lies over , which will follow from a theorem we shall prove later.
Notice are fields since are maximal. Moreover, there is a natural way to view as a subfield of . Since , there is a ring homomorphism from whose kernel is . Now hence we have an embedding . The fields are called the residue fields associated with . The residue fields of a number ring are finite as was shown when proving every number field is a Dedekind domain, hence is a finite extension of . Let be the degree of this extension. We call the inertial degree of over , and denote it by .
Example: Let . Then 2 in lies under the prime in .