The Heptadecagon
In 1796, a teenage Gauss proved that a regular 17-gon can be constructed using a straight-edge and compass by showing that a primitive 17th root of unity can be found by solving a succession of quadratic equations over the rationals.
Factorizing \(x^{17} - 1 = 0\) yields:
Let \(\zeta = e^{{2\pi i / 17}}\) be a primitive 17th root of unity. Since \(\zeta \ne 1\), we must have:
Since \(3\) is a generator of \(\mathbb{Z}_{17}^*\), the primitive 17th roots of unity can be written in the sequence
Define \(x_1\) to be the sum of every second member of the sequence, and \(x_2\) to be the sum of the other members, that is,
Then \(x_1 + x_2 = -1\). By construction, \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) are Gaussian periods which means it is easy to compute \(x_1 x_2 = -4\) (or use brute force(!)), thus \(x_1 , x_2\) are roots of a quadratic equation with integer coefficients, namely \((-1 \pm \sqrt{17}) / 2\). The solution \(x_1\) is the positive one since only two terms in its sum point to the left on the complex plane.
Next define \(y_1, y_2\) from the elements used to construct \(x_1\) in a similar way:
To save room, let us calculate the powers of \(3 \pmod{17}\):
Thus
Then \(y_1 + y_2 = x_1\). It turns out \(y_1 y_2 = -1\), thus \(y_1, y_2\) are roots of a quadratic equation with coefficients involving the integers and \(x_1\).
Similarly we can define \(y_3, y_4\) from \(x_2\)
and solve a quadratic to obtain their values.
Now define \(z_1, z_2\) from \(y_1\) in this fashion:
We have \(z_1 + z_2 = y_1\) and \(z_1 z_2 = y_3\), so \(z_1, z_2\) can be found from a quadratic whose coefficients we know. Lastly we either note that both the sum and product of \(\zeta\) and \(\zeta^{16}\) are known so they can be found from a quadratic, or use the fact that
and simply halve \(z_1\).
We can generalize this procedure to find expressions for any root of unity.
A Magic Solution
Using the above, we can give an elementary method for finding \(\cos (2\pi /17)\) that seems to work magically. If we don’t mention generators the solution appears mysterious.
Let \(c_m = \cos(2 \pi m / 17)\). By considering the sums of the roots of unity we have \(2(c_1 + ... + c_8) = -1\).
Set
By basic trigonometric identities we have
(These correspond to the \(y_i\) s above.) Thus \(a + b + c + d = -1/4\). Also,
Similarly \(b d = -1/16\). We also find \(16 a b = -1 + 4a + 4b\), along with similar equations for \(b c, c d, d a\). Define
(Naturally, \(e, f\) correspond to \(x_1, x_2\) above.) Then
so we can solve a quadratic equation to find \(e, f\). Once we have them, we can solve a quadratic equation to find \(a, c\), and another to find \(b, d\). With these values we can solve for \(c_1\).
[I found this version in a solution that also describes a practical straight-edge-and-compass construction.]