# Generators

A unit \(g \in \mathbb{Z}_n^*\) is called a *generator* or
*primitive root* of \(\mathbb{Z}_n^*\) if for every \(a \in \mathbb{Z}_n^*\)
we have \(g^k = a\) for some integer \(k\). In other words,
if we start with \(g\), and keep multiplying by \(g\) eventually we
see every element.

**Example**: \(3\) is a generator of \(\mathbb{Z}_4^*\) since
\(3^1 = 3, 3^2 = 1\) are the units of \(\mathbb{Z}_4^*\).

**Example**: \(3\) is a generator of \(\mathbb{Z}_7^*\).
From before the powers of \(3\) are
\(3, 2, 6, 4, 5, 1\) which are the units of \(\mathbb{Z}_7^*\).

**Example**: \(3\) is not a generator of \(\mathbb{Z}_{11}^*\) since
the powers of \(3 \pmod{11}\) are \(3, 9, 5, 4, 1\) which is only half
of \(\mathbb{Z}_{11}^*\).

**Theorem**: Let \(p\) be a prime. Then \(\mathbb{Z}_p^*\) contains
exactly \(\phi(p-1)\) generators. In general, for every divisor \(d | p - 1\),
\(\mathbb{Z}_p^*\) contains \(\phi(d)\) elements of order \(d\).

**Proof**: by Fermat’s Theorem we know
the equation

has \(p-1\) distinct solutions, namely every element of \(\mathbb{Z}_p^*\). Let \(q^k\) be a prime power dividing \(p-1\). Then we can factorize the above

where \(g(x)\) is some degree \(p-1-q^k\) polynomial. From our notes on polynomials we know that \((x^{q^k} - 1)\) has at most \(q^k\) roots and \(g(x)\) has at most \(p-1-q^k\) roots, and since their product has \(p-1\) different roots, we see that there are exactly \(q^k\) distinct solutions to

Any solution \(a\) must have order dividing \(q^k\). Suppose such an \(a\) has order less than \(q^k\). Then its order must divide \(q^{k-1}\), and \(a\) is a solution of \(x^{q^{k-1}} - 1 = 0\).

By a similar argument \(x^{q^{k-1}} - 1\) (which is a factor of \(x^{q^k} - 1\)) has exactly \(q^{k-1}\) distinct roots, so there must be exactly \(q^k - q^{k-1}\) roots of \(x^{q^k} - 1\) that are not roots of \(x^{q^{k-1}}\) and hence are of order \(q^k\). Recall \(q^k - q^{k-1} = \phi(q^k)\).

Factorize \(p-1\) into primes:

For each \(q_i^{k_i}\) we find an element \(a_i\) with order \(q_i^{k_i}\). Since the orders of each \(a_i\) are coprime, the order of their product is equal to the product of their orders, that is \(a_1...a_n\) has order \(q_1^{k_1}...q_n^{k_n} = p-1\) and thus is a generator.

We have \(\phi(q_i^{k_i})\) choices for each \(a_i\) thus we have exactly \(\phi(q_1^{k_1})...\phi(q_n^{k_n}) = \phi(p-1)\) different generators.

A similar argument proves the theorem for the divisors of \(p-1\).∎

**Alternative Proof**: We can use a counting argument and basic
facts about cyclic groups instead.

Any element \(a \in\mathbb{Z}_p^*\) must have order dividing \(p-1\) (by Fermat). Then if \(a\) has order \(d\), the solutions of

are precisely \(a, a^2,...,a^d = 1\) and there are no other elements of order \(d\) since \(x^d - 1\) has at most \(d\) roots.

It is easy to show that \(a^k\) has order \(d\) if and only if \(\gcd(k, d) = 1\), thus either there are no elements of order \(d\) or there are exactly \(\phi(d)\) elements of order \(d\).

Now \(\sum_{d|p-1} \phi(d) = p-1\) (which we can prove using multiplicative functions or cyclic groups) and if any of the \(\phi(d)\) were replaced with \(0\) on the left-hand side, the equality would fail. Hence there must be exactly \(\phi(d)\) elements of order \(d\) for each \(d | p-1\) (since each one of the \(p-1\) elements of \(\mathbb{Z}_p^*\) must have some order). ∎

*blynn@cs.stanford.edu*💡